17 years helping Australian businesses
choose better software

About ShireSystem

CMMS/CAFM maintenance and asset management software for asset maintenance, estates and facilities professionals.

Learn more about ShireSystem

Pros:

Most of it's functions are intuitive and you can use it easily even if you have no previous experience of using this type of software.

Cons:

There are some features that don't allow you to rectify a mistake if you make one.

ShireSystem ratings

Average score

Ease of Use
4.3
Customer Service
4.5
Features
4.1
Value for Money
4.8

Likelihood to recommend

8.7/10

ShireSystem has an overall rating of 4.5 out 5 stars based on 15 user reviews on Capterra.

Have you used ShireSystem before?

Share your experiences with other software buyers.

Filter reviews (15)

James
business administrator in US
Verified LinkedIn User
Management Consulting, 51–200 Employees
Used the Software for: 1+ year
Reviewer Source

system with useful functionalities

5.0 2 years ago

Comments: a better standardization of maintenance can be carried out, saving costs and extending the useful life of the files

Pros:

- I really liked the support team as they kindly answer all the questions one by one in such a well-explained way that they leave no doubt- Its work order function makes it easy to keep track of the work that is or is not being done- in general its use is easy to perform- I can coordinate my maintenance schedule in a more strategic way

Cons:

No, I don't have anything to write that I don't like about this platform called ShireSystem

Steve
Facilities & Ops Support Manager in UK
Retail, 11–50 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Alternatives Considered:

Happy to review and recommend

5.0 4 years ago

Comments: Overall I would say that ShireSystem is very scalable, and comes at a price to suit most pockets

Pros:

I rely very much on ShireSystem to Coordinate my maintenance scheduling, data recording and my H&S and training compliance. I've always found the software to be, adaptable, user friendly and very dependable

Cons:

If I'm pushed to find a negative I would say that the Mobile Pro module could be a bit more user friendly by adopting an easier step by step approach.

Elecosoft Response

4 years ago

Thank you for your review Steve. Great to see you can't find a negative using ShireSystem!

Sinead
Facilities Admin in Ireland
Pharmaceuticals, 501–1,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 6-12 months
Reviewer Source

Scheduler

3.0 4 years ago

Comments: It is great for the day to day helpdesk we use the funcition for
The Scheduler is hard to use and set up as required

Pros:

The Work Order function is great to allow requests be self generated. The screen filtering for this is handy. allowing users to be able to further filter and create appropriate heading would be easier

Cons:

The scheduler has very limited changes or Filtering is difficult in the scheduler Changes are not easily made Filtering is difficult in the scheduler to be able to assign costs to jobs without rates would be great for repairs the help function doesn't follow a process to link steps.

Elecosoft Response

4 years ago

Thanks for your feedback Sinead. We will take a look at the points raised.

Colin
Maintenance Manager in Bahrain
Utilities, 51–200 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Pirana - Why use anything else?

5.0 4 years ago

Comments: Overall, my experience with Pirana has been excellent. As mentioned before a lot of it is intuitive and you can use many of it's functions in a way that suits you.
My main gripe with Shire Systems, rather than the actual software, is that they won't rectify the sort of problems as mentioned earlier, that must affect all users. This is a shame as it detracts from what is one of the best pieces of maintenance software that I have used.

Pros:

Pirana is inexpensive, is easy to set up and can be expanded with extra modules. Most of it's functions are intuitive and you can use it easily even if you have no previous experience of using this type of software. It also has a detailed help file if you get stuck or are unsure about something. The reports pretty much cover anything that you might need. Being able to download nearly everything to Excel is extremely useful as you can then edit and format the data to suit what you want. Shire Systems will produce tailor-made reports if you require them, but they do seem a bit reluctant to do this when you ask them.

Cons:

There are some features that don't allow you to rectify a mistake if you make one. For instance, if you receive some goods to the wrong work order, even if you then change the work order number on the purchase order, those goods are still on the costs tab of the work order and have to be removed manually and then added manually to the correct work order. If you want to delete something and the message pops up that tells you the item may be in use somewhere else in the system, it doesn't tell you where, and you can't delete the item.

Elecosoft Response

4 years ago

Thank you for your review Colin. Great to see feedback.

Rob
Asset Information Manager in Isle of Man
Utilities, 201–500 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Pirana CMMS

4.0 4 years ago

Comments: We are an SME and the use of Pirana has allowed us to integrate maintenancea across all of our facilities and bring the standardisation of our maintenance to a new level. The ability to interrogate costs of maintenance is giving us further insight into our operational expeniture. Of equal value are Shire's support team, they have proven their value time and again in assisting us with improving our system and the use of the CMMS.

Pros:

Our company opted for a hosted system and the accesibility and availability is perfect, the also software integrates well with mobile device use for field users. The software is easy to configure and there are many layers of user control that can be set to give the end users the right amount of interaction with the system.

Cons:

The one thing that is lacking that I would find useful is an audit trail on changes in the system as this would help interrogate where user or data errors have occured in the system.

Elecosoft Response

4 years ago

Thanks for the feedback Rob

Andy
Infrastructue manager in UK
Education Management, 1,001–5,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Alternatives Considered:

My opinion

4.0 5 years ago

Comments: During Covid our interrogation of the system for compliance needs were invaluable if course the performance of the system is only as good as the information input

Pros:

The features of this product are fantastic, we can interrogate the system for information and lodge important documentation, we also like the ability to add many users with various permissions, The asset register and locations are easy to set up

Cons:

We would like to see a single sign on for our staff to improve the security, if we had this then more work requests can be made through the system by our 4k employees, this would enable better record keeping for work requests from all areas

Jon
Consultant in UK
Facilities Services, 2–10 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Pirana development and in use last 10 years

4.0 5 years ago

Comments: A basic system and very competent with increasing functionality

Pros:

The straight forward functionality and the UK support that understands the requirements - not just developer lead

Cons:

There is not the functionality of that of high end IWMS, CAFM & CMMS - but having said that and experience over 30 years of systems it is extremely difficult to maintain a sophisticated deployment

Mark
Engineering Manager in UK
Printing, 5,001–10,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Zebra Technologies Europe Ltd

4.0 5 years ago

Comments: I have been a user for many many years we had licence number [SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN] and overall very happy with the product

Pros:

Easy to use and navigate the system for non experienced users

Cons:

1. Bugs in the system can be quite frustrating when they appear, as an example were we need to send the SQL to you for something that has all traces of its history being deleted but you still cant delete. On the positive side of that you always do this quickly when needed. 2. Not being able to clone assets on mobile pro. 3. Not being able to fit some parts of the software to the screen extents.

Dean
Egineering Manager in UK
Food Production, 1,001–5,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Alternatives Considered:

Great system

5.0 5 years ago

Comments: I have used Shire systems for many years and as each year goes by the software gets better

Pros:

Easy to use and functions available for all to see

Cons:

The mobile Pro system could be improved to make data entry easier ie reporting of reactive breakdowns. Would be great to see a simple tab for breakdown work

Matthew
Test Equpuipment Engineer in US
Airlines/Aviation, 501–1,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 1+ year
Reviewer Source

All Round Brilliant System

5.0 5 years ago

Comments: Shire on the whole has been very supportive through the entire process of training, implementation, and contiued support.
Several members of the team using the system have commented that it is much better than any other maintanence system they have used before.

Pros:

The flexibility of the system and the way the respective modules link into one another is fantastic.

Cons:

Its not a Con as such as it is undestandable why, but the system is out of the box and is what it is, you can not tailor it specifically for your application, however, Shire are open to customer input and any updates can implement customer requests if there are enough to warrant the improvement.

Dougie
Engineering Manager in UK
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing, 51–200 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Engineering Manager

5.0 5 years ago

Comments: The system itself has been fairly reliable when called upon tech support have resolved issues in a quick duration.

Pros:

The software is user friendly, ease of use and navigating between functions or screens. Fairly easy to pick up and use.

Cons:

The ability to have a bar code scanner that could be used to sign on and sign off work order would be beneficial as well as having the bar code on all work orders.

Matt
Engineering and Facilities Manager in UK
Food Production, 501–1,000 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

User Freindly Software

5.0 5 years ago

Comments: We are able to manage the assetts and work flow for 70 sites.

Pros:

I like the fact that with quite limited training, the software is very intuititve to use. It has great functionality which is easy to exploit, and when you need some help, both the online and help desk are easily accesible.

Cons:

We have yet to find any negatives, but we will find areas specific to our industry that may warrant feedback as we continue development our use of the system.

Ashley
Maintenance Team Leader in UK
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering, 201–500 Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

Good software but still in its infancy feature wise.

4.0 5 years ago

Comments: Overall good although nothing to compare against.

Pros:

Web based so easy to access from any pc in the company that is on the network. The software is easy to use and requires little training from a users point of view.

Cons:

The pages could do with loading up faster. Still some features missing compared to Frontline. Still no customisable reports. Not keen on the newest icons, time could have been better spent on functionality.

Antony
Maintenance Planner in UK
Food Production, 51–200 Employees
Used the Software for: 6-12 months
Reviewer Source

Fine

4.0 4 years ago

Comments: It does some things well and other things not so well but it gets the job the done and has helped my role.

Pros:

The report features are good and the breadth of the software is good.

Cons:

There is no description within that tells you how the data is recorded or applied for reports, making it difficult to put a best practice document together, the signing off, description and instruction writing is not the best as the home page only gives you the briefest description and the "Task Instructions" doesn't give much scope. I know the names can be changed internally but having them on a different tab isn't the best design either.

Elecosoft Response

4 years ago

Thanks for the feedback Antony.

Andrew
Facilities HSE Manager in UK
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, 10,000+ Employees
Used the Software for: 2+ years
Reviewer Source

ShireSystem was our first choice for computerised maintenance management system

5.0 4 years ago

Comments: Ensuring that work that cannot be completed, deferred, is not safety or business critical.

Pros:

Dead easy to use, for someone like myself who doesn't use it every day. It's screens are clear and easy to navigate

Cons:

The colour coding is not so great if you are colour blind!

Elecosoft Response

4 years ago

Thank you for your review Andrew. Great to see feedback.