IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS

DNG - IBM CLM Requirement Management Solution

Pros:

Integration across different tools with respect to overall product lifecycle including Software, Hardware, Electrical and Mechanical domain

Cons:

Due to High Cost, solution is not feasible for small industry

Using DOORS for mapping the technical requirements.

Comments: It is the systematic way of mapping / arranging the requirements and their associated factors/links under one heading. The changes made in the modules fall under one person category which makes it easy to understand who has made the changes, and what are the changes, and analysis comments provide the information of why the changes were made.

Pros:

All the attributes are systematically aligned with the required texts.The filtering option can be efficiently used.Multiple users can access/edit a single module using the shareable edit option.

Cons:

Sometimes the linking of the requirements takes a lot of time to reflect.The software takes time when multiple people access the same module.

Easy to use and understand

Pros:

The interface is quite intuitive. This is so much better than the old DOORS tool -- so much easier to navigate and read. There is a lot of flexibility without making the interface confusing.

Cons:

There really isn't anything I dislike about it. It does the job of requirements management well.

Requirement Management

Comments: Over all experience is good, by this we can maintain requirements traceability in all system life cycle

Pros:

Easy to capture system requirements and software requirements, easy to maintain traceability as per v model

Cons:

System loading time is to read software requirements and system requirements are some times very slow

Nice control to project

Comments: As an Enginner in big organisation from few years, I'm using Doors every day to get updates about projects that we are working on. This tool made our working developement easier since we can get a look in any requirement for projects, with a total tracibilities.

Pros:

Ability to have all artifacts in one place with total tracibility. We can get a great view for requirements automatic tracking to changes made in objects Easy linking between modules with DXL Nice filters and costumizable

Cons:

Sometimes is slow to connect and launch Complexity of setting up the software or to make changes after components connection done dependencies with other softwares

Requirement Management Solution for Geotechnical Industry

Comments: IBM Rational Suite products are mostly used by all industries with best features.

Pros:

We were using IBM Rational DOORS for Requirement Management, Traceability. Customization using dxl scripting is really interesting feature.

Cons:

Cost of solution is not affordable for small scale industry so we need to use sharing based single license for our team.

best one to track requirement handling and management

Comments: its good for requirement management and tracking. features like filters, attributes, custom views, export-import support eliminates additional effort. anyway sometimes its little boring to adapt the templates followed by the organization.

Pros:

baselines, custom views, attributes, tracing and the traceability reports.

Cons:

DOORS need a lot of training in the initial. and doesn't support import of tables and images properly but very rare.

Strumento di Gestione requirements necessario

Comments: Utilizzato per l'analisi e la modifica dei requirements.

Pros:

Doors di IBM è necessario per la gestione, l'analisi e lo studio dei requirements.Facilità d'uso media ma interfaccia leggera.

Cons:

Condivisione dei path da migliorare.Apertura e chiusura del tool lenta.